Rust app built with Supermaven? Let’s review it.

Expert code review for Rust apps built with Supermaven. We find Supermaven-specific bugs, fix Rust security issues, and optimize performance. From $19.

Supermaven issues we find in Rust projects

Problems specific to Supermaven's code generation patterns when building Rust apps.

highSupermaven

Fast completions accepted without review introduce subtle type errors

Supermaven's speed is its core advantage, but it encourages accepting completions quickly. TypeScript type errors, incorrect function signatures, and wrong argument orders frequently slip through when developers tab-accept completions at high speed.

highSupermaven

Security-sensitive code patterns completed without security review

In security-critical code paths like authentication, token validation, and database queries, Supermaven's completions can introduce subtle vulnerabilities — such as completing a SQL query without parameterization or missing a signature verification step.

mediumSupermaven

Existing codebase anti-patterns replicated across new files at high velocity

Supermaven learns from your codebase, which means bad patterns — deprecated APIs, insecure functions, or architectural mistakes — get propagated to new code rapidly due to how quickly completions are accepted.

mediumSupermaven

Test completions mirror happy-path structure without edge case coverage

When completing test code, Supermaven tends to replicate the structure of surrounding tests, which often means test completions also omit edge cases, error paths, and boundary conditions that the surrounding tests miss.

Rust issues we check for

Common Rust problems that affect production readiness.

performance

Excessive .clone() usage

AI tools clone data everywhere to satisfy the borrow checker instead of using references, lifetimes, or Cow — defeating Rust's zero-cost abstraction goals.

security

Unnecessary unsafe blocks

Using unsafe to bypass compiler checks rather than restructuring code to work within safe Rust, introducing memory safety vulnerabilities.

bugs

Improper error handling with unwrap()

Calling .unwrap() and .expect() on Result and Option types instead of proper error propagation with ? operator, causing panics in production.

performance

Blocking in async contexts

Using std::thread::sleep, synchronous I/O, or blocking mutex locks inside async functions, starving the Tokio runtime of worker threads.

Start with a self-serve audit

Get a professional review of your Supermaven Rust project at a fixed price.

External Security Scan

Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.

$19
  • OWASP Top 10 vulnerability check
  • SSL/TLS configuration analysis
  • Security header assessment
  • Expert review within 24h
Get Started

Code Audit

In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.

$19
  • Security vulnerability analysis
  • Code quality review
  • Dependency audit
  • Architecture review
  • Expert + AI code analysis
Get Started
Best Value

Complete Bundle

Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.

$29$38
  • Everything in both products
  • Cross-referenced findings
  • Unified action plan
Get Started

100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.

Frequently asked questions

Can you review Rust code generated by Supermaven?

Yes. We regularly audit Rust projects built with Supermaven and understand the specific patterns and issues it introduces. Our review covers security, performance, and deployment readiness.

What Rust issues does Supermaven typically create?

Common issues in Supermaven-generated Rust code include: fast completions accepted without review introduce subtle type errors, security-sensitive code patterns completed without security review, existing codebase anti-patterns replicated across new files at high velocity. Combined with Rust-specific concerns like excessive .clone() usage and unnecessary unsafe blocks.

How do I make my Supermaven Rust project production-ready?

Start with our code audit ($19) to get a prioritized list of issues. For Supermaven-built Rust projects, the typical path is: fix security gaps, address Rust-specific performance issues, then configure deployment. We provide a fixed quote after the audit.

How much does it cost to review Supermaven-generated Rust code?

Our code audit starts at $19 and covers security, performance, architecture, and deployment readiness. For fixes, our Fix & Ship plan is $199. Larger projects get a custom fixed quote — no hourly billing or surprises.

Need help with your Supermaven Rust project?

Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.

Tell Us About Your App