Rust

Expert Rust Code Review for AI-Built Apps

Rust is used for performance-critical systems, CLIs, and WebAssembly. AI tools struggle with Rust's ownership model and borrow checker, often generating code that compiles but uses excessive cloning, unsafe blocks, and inefficient patterns.

Common Rust issues we find

Real problems from Rust codebases we've reviewed.

Performance

Excessive .clone() usage

AI tools clone data everywhere to satisfy the borrow checker instead of using references, lifetimes, or Cow — defeating Rust's zero-cost abstraction goals.

Security

Unnecessary unsafe blocks

Using unsafe to bypass compiler checks rather than restructuring code to work within safe Rust, introducing memory safety vulnerabilities.

Bug

Improper error handling with unwrap()

Calling .unwrap() and .expect() on Result and Option types instead of proper error propagation with ? operator, causing panics in production.

Performance

Blocking in async contexts

Using std::thread::sleep, synchronous I/O, or blocking mutex locks inside async functions, starving the Tokio runtime of worker threads.

Bug

Missing Send + Sync bounds

Types shared across threads without proper trait bounds, causing compilation errors or runtime panics when moving data between async tasks.

Rust production checklist

Key checks before deploying your Rust app.

No unnecessary .clone() calls (use references or Cow)

performance

Zero unsafe blocks unless absolutely justified and documented

security

Proper error propagation with ? and custom error types

quality

No blocking operations in async contexts

performance

Cargo.toml dependencies pinned to specific versions

deployment

Release profile optimized (opt-level, LTO, codegen-units)

deployment

Clippy lints passing with no warnings

quality

Integration tests for critical paths

quality

Not sure if your app passes? Our code audit ($19) checks all of these and more.

Start with a self-serve audit

Get a professional review of your Rust project at a fixed price.

Security Scan

Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.

$19
  • OWASP Top 10 checks
  • SSL/TLS analysis
  • Security headers
  • Expert review within 24h
Get Started

Code Audit

In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.

$19
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Code quality review
  • Dependency audit
  • AI pattern analysis
Get Started
Best Value

Complete Bundle

Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.

$29$38
  • Everything in both products
  • Cross-referenced findings
  • Unified action plan
Get Started

100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.

How it works

1

Tell us about your app

Share your project details and what you need help with.

2

Get a clear plan

We respond in 24 hours with scope, timeline, and cost.

3

Launch with confidence

We fix what needs fixing and stick around to help.

Frequently asked questions

Can AI tools write good Rust code?

AI tools produce Rust that compiles but often fights the language — excessive cloning, unnecessary unsafe, and poor async patterns. A review restructures it to be idiomatic and performant.

Why does my AI-generated Rust code use so much .clone()?

AI tools clone to quickly satisfy the borrow checker. We restructure your code to use proper lifetimes, references, and ownership patterns — improving both performance and code clarity.

Can you optimize my Rust application's performance?

Yes. We eliminate unnecessary allocations, optimize async patterns, configure release build profiles, and benchmark critical paths to ensure peak performance.

Other technologies we work with

Need help with your Rust project?

Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.

Tell Us About Your App