Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor for developer tools
Comparing Sourcegraph Cody and Cursor for building developer tools. See which tool is better and get expert code review for your AI-built project. From $19.
Developer Tool challenges we solve
Common developer tool issues in apps built with Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor.
Error messages and developer experience
Developers expect error messages that tell them exactly what went wrong, why, and how to fix it. AI-generated tools return generic 'Something went wrong' messages or raw stack traces. Good DX means every error is actionable and every edge case has a helpful response.
API design and consistency
Developer tools live or die by their API surface — whether REST endpoints, CLI arguments, or SDK methods. Naming must be consistent, behavior must be predictable, and breaking changes must be versioned. AI tools generate functional but inconsistent APIs that frustrate developers.
Documentation and examples
Developers won't use your tool if they can't figure it out quickly. You need API reference docs, getting-started guides, code examples in multiple languages, and a changelog. AI tools build the tool but not the documentation ecosystem around it.
Performance and latency
Developer tools are often in the critical path of other developers' workflows — slow API responses, laggy CLIs, or unresponsive dashboards directly waste their time. Every millisecond matters. AI-generated tools have unoptimized database queries and no caching.
Authentication and API key management
Developer tools need API key generation, key rotation, scoped permissions per key, usage tracking, and rate limiting. AI tools implement a single hardcoded API key or basic bearer tokens without any key lifecycle management.
Webhook and integration reliability
If your tool sends webhooks or integrates with other services, deliveries must be reliable — with retry logic, delivery logging, signature verification, and a way for users to test and debug integrations. AI tools fire-and-forget webhooks with no reliability guarantees.
Which is better for developer tool?
Sourcegraph Cody
Best for enterprise teams working in large monorepos who need deep codebase context and strong security controls.
Sourcegraph Cody code reviewCursor
Best for individual developers or small teams who want a fast, fluid AI-native editing experience without leaving their IDE.
Cursor code reviewStart with a self-serve audit
Get a professional review of your developer tool app, regardless of whether you built it with Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor.
External Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 vulnerability check
- SSL/TLS configuration analysis
- Security header assessment
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerability analysis
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- Architecture review
- Expert + AI code analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
How it works
Tell us about your app
Share your project details and what you need help with.
Expert + AI audit
A human expert assisted by AI reviews your code within 24 hours.
Launch with confidence
We fix what needs fixing and stick around to help.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for developer tools: Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
Both can build developer tools, but they have different strengths. Sourcegraph Cody best for enterprise teams working in large monorepos who need deep codebase context and strong security controls., while Cursor best for individual developers or small teams who want a fast, fluid ai-native editing experience without leaving their ide.. Our code review covers apps built with either tool.
Can you review a developer tool built with Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
Yes. We review developer tools built with any AI coding tool. Our audit covers the specific developer tool challenges like error messages and developer experience and api design and consistency.
What issues should I watch for in developer tools from AI tools?
Common developer tool issues include error messages and developer experience, api design and consistency, documentation and examples. These apply regardless of whether you used Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor. Our code audit catches all of them.
How do I get my AI-built developer tool production-ready?
Start with our code audit ($19) — it covers developer tool-specific issues regardless of which AI tool you used. We check security, architecture, and deployment readiness, then provide a fixed quote for any fixes needed.
Related resources
Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor for Other Use Cases
Building a developer tool with Sourcegraph Cody or Cursor?
Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.