Sourcegraph Cody vs Cursor
Sourcegraph Cody leverages enterprise-grade codebase indexing for deep context, while Cursor brings AI-native editing directly into a VS Code fork. Both target professional developers but optimize for different workflows.
Sourcegraph Cody excels in large monorepo environments where understanding cross-file context is critical. Cursor focuses on a fluid, inline AI editing experience that feels native to the IDE. The right choice depends on whether you prioritize repository-wide intelligence or seamless in-editor flow.
Head-to-head comparison
Code structure
Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph Cody
Cody uses Sourcegraph's code graph to understand dependencies and symbols across the entire repo, producing contextually accurate suggestions.
Cursor
Cursor's multi-file context window is strong for mid-sized projects, with composer mode enabling coordinated edits across several files at once.
Security
Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph Cody
Cody offers enterprise SSO, air-gapped deployment options, and no training on customer code by default — a strong choice for regulated industries.
Cursor
Cursor stores context locally and offers a privacy mode, but lacks the enterprise compliance certifications Cody provides out of the box.
Speed of prototyping
CursorSourcegraph Cody
Cody's suggestions are thorough but can feel slower due to deep indexing lookups on large codebases.
Cursor
Cursor's inline autocomplete and chat feel instantaneous for rapid prototyping, making iteration very fast for small-to-medium projects.
Backend/data layer
Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph Cody
Cody understands backend schemas and API patterns through its graph, making it reliable for complex data-layer changes.
Cursor
Cursor handles backend code well within its context window but may lose accuracy in very large service-oriented architectures.
Deployment readiness
Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph Cody
Cody integrates with CI/CD pipelines through Sourcegraph's platform, supporting batch code changes at scale.
Cursor
Cursor is an editor tool and does not provide native deployment or CI/CD integration beyond what the developer sets up manually.
Long-term maintainability
Sourcegraph CodySourcegraph Cody
Code produced with Cody's context-aware suggestions tends to follow existing project conventions, reducing drift over time.
Cursor
Cursor-generated code is high quality but may introduce style inconsistencies in large teams without enforced linting and review gates.
Code quality
Both tools produce production-quality code, but Cody's repository-wide context gives it an edge in consistency across large, complex codebases. Cursor wins on speed and developer ergonomics for smaller projects or solo developers.
Security
Cody is the clear winner for security-sensitive environments, offering enterprise-grade data controls and compliance options. Cursor's privacy mode is adequate for most developers but does not meet strict enterprise compliance requirements.
Which should you choose?
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if...
Best for enterprise teams working in large monorepos who need deep codebase context and strong security controls.
Sourcegraph Cody servicesChoose Cursor if...
Best for individual developers or small teams who want a fast, fluid AI-native editing experience without leaving their IDE.
Cursor servicesThe bottom line
Sourcegraph Cody is the stronger choice for enterprise and large-scale engineering teams. Cursor is the better daily driver for developers who value speed and a polished AI editing experience.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can Sourcegraph Cody be used without a Sourcegraph instance?
Yes — Cody has a standalone VS Code extension that works without a self-hosted Sourcegraph instance, though full code graph features require one.
Does Cursor work with languages other than JavaScript and Python?
Yes, Cursor supports all major programming languages including Go, Rust, Java, C++, and more through its underlying language model.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.