Built a mvp / prototype with Sourcegraph Cody?
We'll make it production-ready.
You built a prototype with an AI tool and it works — on your machine, with your test data, for the happy path. Now you need real users to validate your idea. The goal isn't perfection — it's getting to a state where real people can use it safely and reliably. That means fixing the critical gaps without over-engineering.
MVP / Prototype challenges in Sourcegraph Cody apps
Building a mvp / prototype with Sourcegraph Cody is a great start — but these challenges need attention before launch.
Identifying what actually needs fixing
Not everything needs to be production-grade for an MVP. The challenge is knowing which shortcuts are acceptable (visual polish, advanced features) and which aren't (security, data loss, broken core flows). Our audit prioritizes fixes by impact.
Security minimum
Even an MVP handles user data. You need authentication that works, data isolated per user, no exposed secrets, and HTTPS. You don't need enterprise-grade security, but you need the basics done right.
Deployment
Your app runs locally but deploying it involves environment variables, domain configuration, SSL, and build optimization. First-time deployment is where most AI prototypes hit unexpected issues.
Error handling
When something goes wrong (and it will), your users should see a helpful message — not a white screen or a raw error. Basic error handling is the difference between 'this app is buggy' and 'something went wrong, please try again.'
Core flow reliability
Your main user flow (signup → core action → outcome) must work every time. Edge cases in secondary flows can wait, but the core path needs to be solid for your MVP to generate valid learnings.
What we check in your Sourcegraph Cody mvp / prototype
Common Sourcegraph Cody issues we fix
Beyond mvp / prototype-specific issues, these are Sourcegraph Cody patterns we commonly fix.
Suggestions based on deprecated or low-quality code patterns found in the existing codebase
Cody's suggestions are grounded in your actual codebase, which means if the codebase contains outdated patterns, deprecated library usage, or known-bad code, Cody will suggest those same patterns in new code — amplifying technical debt.
Cross-repo context can leak patterns from one team's code into another team's service
In large organizations where Cody indexes multiple repositories, suggestions can carry patterns from one team's codebase into another, introducing unfamiliar dependencies, different error handling conventions, or architectural approaches that do not belong in the target service.
Security vulnerabilities in existing code recommended as reference implementations
If the indexed codebase contains known security issues that have not yet been patched — unparameterized queries, missing auth checks, insecure deserialization — Cody may suggest these patterns as examples when generating similar code.
Performance anti-patterns replicated from existing high-traffic code paths
When Cody finds existing code as a reference for a new feature, it may replicate performance issues — N+1 queries, missing indexes, blocking synchronous calls — that are accepted in the existing code but will be problematic at the scale of the new feature.
Start with a self-serve audit
Get a professional review of your Sourcegraph Cody mvp / prototype at a fixed price.
External Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 vulnerability check
- SSL/TLS configuration analysis
- Security header assessment
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerability analysis
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- Architecture review
- Expert + AI code analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can I build a mvp / prototype with Sourcegraph Cody?
Sourcegraph Cody is a great starting point for a mvp / prototype. It handles the initial scaffolding well, but mvp / prototype apps have specific requirements — identifying what actually needs fixing and security minimum — that need professional attention before launch.
What issues does Sourcegraph Cody leave in mvp / prototype apps?
Common issues include: suggestions based on deprecated or low-quality code patterns found in the existing codebase, cross-repo context can leak patterns from one team's code into another team's service, security vulnerabilities in existing code recommended as reference implementations. For a mvp / prototype specifically, these issues are compounded by the need for identifying what actually needs fixing.
How do I make my Sourcegraph Cody mvp / prototype production-ready?
Start with our code audit ($19) to get a clear picture of what needs fixing. For most Sourcegraph Cody-built mvp / prototype apps, the critical path is: security review, then fixing core flow reliability, then deployment. We provide a fixed quote after the audit.
How much does it cost to fix a Sourcegraph Cody-built mvp / prototype?
Our code audit is $19 and gives you a complete report of issues. Fixes start at $199 with our Fix & Ship plan. For larger mvp / prototype projects, we provide a custom fixed quote after the audit — no hourly billing.
Get your Sourcegraph Cody mvp / prototype production-ready
Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.