Built with Jules?
Let's make sure it's production-ready.
Jules is Google's autonomous coding agent that integrates with GitHub to fix bugs and implement features asynchronously. It reads your codebase, plans changes, and opens pull requests — working in the background while you do other things. We help non-technical founders identify and fix the issues AI tools leave behind.
Common issues we find in Jules code
These are real problems we see in Jules projects during our audits — not hypotheticals.
PRs may conflict with concurrent team changes
Jules works asynchronously on tasks that may take hours. While it's working, your team continues committing. The resulting PR can conflict with merged changes in ways that are complex to resolve.
Security-sensitive PRs need careful human review
Jules implements security fixes and auth changes autonomously. Without careful review, a PR that looks correct can introduce subtle security regressions in adjacent code paths.
Jules may not understand implicit project conventions
Jules reads your codebase but can miss undocumented team conventions — naming patterns, error handling styles, and architectural decisions that aren't expressed in code.
Async PR scope may be too narrow or too broad
Jules interprets task descriptions literally. A fix for one bug may miss related bugs in the same module, or conversely, a feature request may result in sweeping changes you didn't intend.
Generated tests may not cover the right scenarios
Jules adds tests to its PRs, but they focus on the specific change made rather than testing the full behavior of the modified component with realistic edge cases.
Long async tasks create merge debt
Jules tasks that take hours accumulate merge conflicts with concurrent commits. Resolving these conflicts correctly requires understanding both the PR and the conflicting changes.
Dependency additions not audited for compatibility
When Jules needs a library, it adds it without checking for version conflicts with your existing dependency tree or known vulnerabilities in the chosen version.
PR descriptions don't explain all changes made
Jules PR descriptions summarize the intent but don't always enumerate every file changed or explain non-obvious implementation choices, making review harder.
How we can help with your Jules project
From security reviews to deployment, we cover everything you need to go from prototype to production.
Security Review
Deep security analysis and hardening
Fix Bugs
Resolve issues and unexpected behavior
Deploy & Ship
Get your Jules app to production
Refactor Code
Clean up AI-generated or legacy code
Performance
Make your Jules app faster and more efficient
Add Features
New functionality, integrations, capabilities
Testing
Add tests and improve coverage
Infrastructure
Set up and manage your Jules backend
Start with a self-serve audit
Get a professional review of your Jules project at a fixed price. Results reviewed by experienced engineers.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
How it works
Tell us about your app
Share your project details and what you need help with.
Get a clear plan
We respond in 24 hours with scope, timeline, and cost.
Launch with confidence
We fix what needs fixing and stick around to help.
Frequently asked questions
Should I merge Jules PRs without careful review?
No — Jules PRs should receive the same review rigor as any pull request. The async nature means the PR may be based on stale state, and security-sensitive changes always need human validation.
Can Jules handle large features or just bug fixes?
Jules handles both, but larger tasks increase the risk of missed conventions and merge conflicts. We recommend using Jules for well-scoped tasks and reviewing the output with SpringCode before merging.
How do I review a Jules PR effectively?
Focus on: correctness of the core change, any adjacent code touched, new dependencies introduced, and test coverage of edge cases. We provide structured PR reviews for Jules-generated code.
Can SpringCode review Jules-generated pull requests?
Yes. We audit Jules PRs for security issues, convention violations, scope problems, and test gaps before you merge them to your main branch.
Is Jules safe to use on a production codebase?
Jules is safe to use as long as you treat its PRs as starting points requiring review, not finished work. For security-sensitive codebases, a formal review process is essential.
Related resources
We also work with
Get your Jules app production-ready
Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.