Go app built with Continue? Let’s review it.
Expert code review for Go apps built with Continue. We find Continue-specific bugs, fix Go security issues, and optimize performance. From $19.
Continue issues we find in Go projects
Problems specific to Continue's code generation patterns when building Go apps.
Model-dependent security quality
Security of generated code varies dramatically based on which LLM is connected. Some models produce much less secure code than others.
Inconsistent code patterns between models
Switching between models mid-project produces inconsistent patterns, naming conventions, and error handling approaches in the same codebase.
Context window limitations causing bugs
When the codebase exceeds the model's context window, Continue loses awareness of existing patterns and introduces contradictory code.
Missing performance best practices
Generated code often uses naive algorithms and data structures. Database queries, API calls, and data processing lack optimization.
Go issues we check for
Common Go problems that affect production readiness.
Ignored error returns
The most common AI-generated Go anti-pattern: using _ to discard error returns from functions. Errors are silently ignored, and the code continues with zero or nil values, causing subtle data corruption.
Goroutine leaks
Goroutines spawned without context cancellation or timeout. They accumulate over time, consuming memory and causing the application to slow down and eventually crash.
Insecure default HTTP server
Using http.ListenAndServe with no timeouts configured. The default Go HTTP server has no read, write, or idle timeouts — making it vulnerable to slowloris and resource exhaustion attacks.
SQL injection via string formatting
Building SQL queries with fmt.Sprintf instead of using parameterized queries with database/sql placeholders, enabling injection attacks.
Start with a self-serve audit
Get a professional review of your Continue Go project at a fixed price.
External Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 vulnerability check
- SSL/TLS configuration analysis
- Security header assessment
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerability analysis
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- Architecture review
- Expert + AI code analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can you review Go code generated by Continue?
Yes. We regularly audit Go projects built with Continue and understand the specific patterns and issues it introduces. Our review covers security, performance, and deployment readiness.
What Go issues does Continue typically create?
Common issues in Continue-generated Go code include: model-dependent security quality, inconsistent code patterns between models, context window limitations causing bugs. Combined with Go-specific concerns like ignored error returns and goroutine leaks.
How do I make my Continue Go project production-ready?
Start with our code audit ($19) to get a prioritized list of issues. For Continue-built Go projects, the typical path is: fix security gaps, address Go-specific performance issues, then configure deployment. We provide a fixed quote after the audit.
How much does it cost to review Continue-generated Go code?
Our code audit starts at $19 and covers security, performance, architecture, and deployment readiness. For fixes, our Fix & Ship plan is $199. Larger projects get a custom fixed quote — no hourly billing or surprises.
Related resources
Need help with your Continue Go project?
Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.