Aider + Developer Tool

Built a developer tool with Aider?
We'll make it production-ready.

Developer tools face the most technically demanding audience there is — other developers. They'll inspect your source code, stress-test your API, and publicly criticize performance issues on Twitter. AI tools can scaffold a CLI, dashboard, or API wrapper quickly, but developer tools need exceptional error messages, comprehensive documentation, and rock-solid reliability because your users know exactly how software should work.

PythonJavaScriptTypeScriptRubyGo

Developer Tool challenges in Aider apps

Building a developer tool with Aider is a great start — but these challenges need attention before launch.

Error messages and developer experience

Developers expect error messages that tell them exactly what went wrong, why, and how to fix it. AI-generated tools return generic 'Something went wrong' messages or raw stack traces. Good DX means every error is actionable and every edge case has a helpful response.

API design and consistency

Developer tools live or die by their API surface — whether REST endpoints, CLI arguments, or SDK methods. Naming must be consistent, behavior must be predictable, and breaking changes must be versioned. AI tools generate functional but inconsistent APIs that frustrate developers.

Documentation and examples

Developers won't use your tool if they can't figure it out quickly. You need API reference docs, getting-started guides, code examples in multiple languages, and a changelog. AI tools build the tool but not the documentation ecosystem around it.

Performance and latency

Developer tools are often in the critical path of other developers' workflows — slow API responses, laggy CLIs, or unresponsive dashboards directly waste their time. Every millisecond matters. AI-generated tools have unoptimized database queries and no caching.

Authentication and API key management

Developer tools need API key generation, key rotation, scoped permissions per key, usage tracking, and rate limiting. AI tools implement a single hardcoded API key or basic bearer tokens without any key lifecycle management.

Webhook and integration reliability

If your tool sends webhooks or integrates with other services, deliveries must be reliable — with retry logic, delivery logging, signature verification, and a way for users to test and debug integrations. AI tools fire-and-forget webhooks with no reliability guarantees.

What we check in your Aider developer tool

API design — consistent naming, predictable behavior, proper status codes
Error handling — actionable error messages for every failure mode
Authentication — API key generation, rotation, scoped permissions
Rate limiting — per-key limits, usage tracking, quota management
Performance — response times under 200ms for common operations
Documentation — auto-generated API reference, code examples, changelog
Webhook reliability — retry logic, delivery logging, signature verification
Testing — automated tests covering core functionality and edge cases
CLI experience — helpful flags, bash completion, clear output formatting
SDK quality — type definitions, error types, idiomatic patterns per language

Common Aider issues we fix

Beyond developer tool-specific issues, these are Aider patterns we commonly fix.

highSecurity

Incomplete security implementations

Aider implements security features in the files it touches but misses corresponding changes in other files — like adding auth to one route but not others.

mediumBugs

Partial refactoring across files

Aider sometimes updates function signatures in one file but misses call sites in other files, causing runtime errors.

lowCode Quality

Git history cluttered with fix commits

Aider's iterative approach creates many small 'fix' commits that make Git history hard to follow and review.

mediumPerformance

Missing cross-file optimizations

Performance improvements applied to individual files but not the system-level patterns that cause the real bottlenecks.

Start with a self-serve audit

Get a professional review of your Aider developer tool at a fixed price.

Security Scan

Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.

$19
  • OWASP Top 10 checks
  • SSL/TLS analysis
  • Security headers
  • Expert review within 24h
Get Started

Code Audit

In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.

$19
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Code quality review
  • Dependency audit
  • AI pattern analysis
Get Started
Best Value

Complete Bundle

Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.

$29$38
  • Everything in both products
  • Cross-referenced findings
  • Unified action plan
Get Started

100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.

Frequently asked questions

Can I build a developer tool with Aider?

Aider is a great starting point for a developer tool. It handles the initial scaffolding well, but developer tool apps have specific requirements — error messages and developer experience and api design and consistency — that need professional attention before launch.

What issues does Aider leave in developer tool apps?

Common issues include: incomplete security implementations, partial refactoring across files, git history cluttered with fix commits. For a developer tool specifically, these issues are compounded by the need for error messages and developer experience.

How do I make my Aider developer tool production-ready?

Start with our code audit ($19) to get a clear picture of what needs fixing. For most Aider-built developer tool apps, the critical path is: security review, then fixing core flow reliability, then deployment. We provide a fixed quote after the audit.

Get your Aider developer tool production-ready

Tell us about your project. We'll respond within 24 hours with a clear plan and fixed quote.

Tell Us About Your App