Lovable vs v0
Lovable builds complete apps. v0 builds UI components. Founders need Lovable for working products; developers use v0 for beautiful UI. Different tools for different goals.
Lovable builds complete apps with backends. v0 generates UI components. They're used by different people for different reasons, but both produce React code and are often discovered by founders exploring AI tools. The comparison comes down to: do you need a full app or beautiful UI components?
Head-to-head comparison
Completeness
LovableLovable
Full applications — frontend, backend (Supabase), auth, database, storage. A working app from a single prompt.
v0
UI components only. No backend, no data layer, no auth. Beautiful components that need everything else built.
UI quality
v0Lovable
Good UI using shadcn/ui. Consistent but sometimes generic. Functional over beautiful.
v0
Excellent UI. The best visual output of any AI tool. Polished, accessible, well-designed components.
Code reusability
v0Lovable
Components are tightly coupled to the generated app. Hard to extract and use elsewhere without refactoring.
v0
Components designed for reuse. Copy into any React/Next.js project. Self-contained and well-structured.
Production path
LovableLovable
Has a production path but needs security hardening (Supabase RLS). Closer to shippable out of the box.
v0
Long production path. Needs a complete backend, state management, data fetching, and auth built from scratch.
Non-technical accessibility
LovableLovable
Designed for non-technical users. Conversational interface, no coding required. Full app from a description.
v0
Primarily for developers. Generates component code that needs to be integrated into a project. Requires coding knowledge.
Customization
TieLovable
Customize through conversation — describe changes and Lovable modifies the app. Limited to what the AI can generate.
v0
Customize through code — modify the generated components directly. Full control but requires development skills.
Code quality
Different products for different needs. Lovable gives you a complete app with rough edges. v0 gives you beautiful components with nothing behind them. For a non-technical founder who needs a working product, Lovable is the clear choice. For a developer who needs polished UI components, v0 is better.
Security
Lovable apps have security concerns — primarily Supabase RLS. v0 components are inherently safe (pure UI) until you connect them to a backend, at which point security depends entirely on your implementation. Lovable's security is more concerning because it ships with a backend that may not be secure.
Which should you choose?
Choose Lovable if...
Non-technical founders who need a complete, working application. Ideal for MVPs and idea validation with real user accounts and data persistence.
Lovable servicesChoose v0 if...
Developers who need polished UI components. Ideal for design-heavy projects or adding beautiful interfaces to existing applications.
v0 servicesThe bottom line
They serve different purposes. Lovable builds apps. v0 builds components. If you're a founder who needs a working product, use Lovable. If you're a developer who needs beautiful UI, use v0. If you want both, use v0 for UI design inspiration and Lovable (or Cursor) for the complete app.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use v0 components in my Lovable app?
Not directly within Lovable's builder. But if you export your Lovable project to GitHub, you can add v0 components to the codebase manually. This requires coding knowledge, so it defeats Lovable's no-code advantage.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.