Lovable vs Replit Agent
Lovable produces more portable code with a shorter path to production. Replit Agent wins for real backend logic beyond CRUD. Both need professional security review before launch.
Lovable and Replit Agent are the two most popular tools for vibe coding a full app from a prompt. Both promise working software without writing code, but they take very different approaches. Lovable generates a React + Supabase app you can export anywhere. Replit Agent builds inside Replit's cloud environment with its own database and hosting. The choice comes down to portability vs. integrated infrastructure — and the code quality trade-offs are significant.
Head-to-head comparison
Code Quality
LovableLovable
Clean React + Vite output with shadcn/ui components. TypeScript is present but types are often loose. Components are small but naming can be vague, and logic is sometimes scattered.
Replit Agent
Full-stack code across Python or Node.js backends. Structure is functional but tightly coupled to Replit services. Variable naming and file organization are decent but inconsistent.
Security
TieLovable
Supabase integration includes auth, but Row Level Security policies are frequently missing or incomplete. Data may be exposed to anyone with the anon key — a critical invisible vulnerability.
Replit Agent
Relies on Replit Auth which doesn't transfer outside the platform. Development servers are often left running in production. Missing HTTPS enforcement and standard security headers.
Ease of Use
LovableLovable
Conversational interface — describe what you want and iterate through chat. No coding knowledge required. Very intuitive for non-technical founders.
Replit Agent
Also prompt-driven, but Replit's environment exposes more complexity (file trees, console output, package management). Slightly steeper learning curve.
Deployment
LovableLovable
Exports to GitHub. Deploy to Vercel, Netlify, or any static host. Supabase config (auth redirects, RLS) needs attention but the process is standard.
Replit Agent
Hosted on Replit out of the box, but cold starts of 5-15 seconds make it unsuitable for real users. Migrating off Replit means replacing Replit DB and Replit Auth entirely.
Scalability
LovableLovable
React + Supabase scales well once RLS is configured. Supabase handles auth, storage, and real-time out of the box. Adding features through conversation works up to a point.
Replit Agent
Replit hosting doesn't scale for production traffic. The code itself can scale once migrated, but the migration is a significant project — replacing platform-specific services with standard ones.
Backend Capability
Replit AgentLovable
Supabase handles database, auth, and storage. All data access is client-side with no server-side abstraction. Hard to add custom backend logic beyond what Supabase offers.
Replit Agent
Real server-side code in Python or Node.js. Can run background jobs, custom APIs, and complex backend logic. More capable for apps that need heavy server processing.
Code quality
Lovable produces cleaner, more portable frontend code with a solid Supabase backend that covers most MVP needs. Replit Agent offers more backend flexibility but ties your code to its platform. For a typical vibe coded SaaS or marketplace, Lovable gets you closer to production. For apps needing custom server logic (data processing, integrations), Replit's backend capability is an advantage — if you plan for the migration.
Security
Both have serious security gaps, just in different places. Lovable's missing Supabase RLS is invisible and dangerous — your app works fine while your data is exposed. Replit's security issues stem from platform coupling — Replit Auth doesn't transfer, and development servers lack production security headers. Neither is safe to launch without a thorough security review.
Which should you choose?
Choose Lovable if...
Non-technical founders who want a polished, portable MVP. Best for SaaS apps, marketplaces, and tools where Supabase covers the backend needs.
Lovable servicesChoose Replit Agent if...
Projects requiring custom server-side logic, background processing, or non-JavaScript backends. Best if you're comfortable with Replit's ecosystem and plan to migrate later.
Replit Agent servicesThe bottom line
Lovable is the better starting point for most founders — the code is more portable, the UI is more polished, and the path to production is shorter. Replit Agent wins when you need real backend logic that goes beyond database CRUD. Whichever you choose, vibe coded apps from both tools need a professional review before launch. SpringCode reviews code from both Lovable and Replit Agent, catching the security gaps and structural issues that block production readiness.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
I'm non-technical — which should I pick?
Lovable. It's simpler to use, the output is more portable, and you won't get locked into a platform. Build your MVP in Lovable, validate your idea with real users, and invest in production hardening when you're ready to scale.
Can I migrate from Replit to standard hosting?
Yes, but it's a significant project. You'll need to replace Replit DB with a standard database (PostgreSQL, Supabase), replace Replit Auth with a standard auth provider, and set up proper hosting. Budget time and money for this migration.
Which produces more secure code out of the box?
Neither is secure out of the box. Lovable's Supabase RLS gaps and Replit's platform-specific auth both create real vulnerabilities. Get a security review before putting real user data in either.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.