JetBrains AI vs GitHub Copilot
JetBrains AI brings AI assistance to IntelliJ-family IDEs while GitHub Copilot works across multiple editors. This comparison examines which produces better code quality for everyday development.
JetBrains AI Assistant is deeply integrated with IntelliJ IDEA, PyCharm, and other JetBrains IDEs, leveraging their static analysis engines for AI-assisted development. GitHub Copilot is editor-agnostic and powers AI assistance in VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, and more. For JetBrains users, this is a particularly relevant comparison.
Head-to-head comparison
Code structure
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI leverages its IDE's deep language understanding to generate highly idiomatic code.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot produces idiomatic code across frameworks but without JetBrains' static analysis depth.
Security
TieJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI integrates with built-in inspections to surface security-related code issues.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot's vulnerability filter catches common insecure patterns independent of IDE analysis.
Speed of prototyping
TieJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI's inline and chat features are well-integrated but limited to the JetBrains ecosystem.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot Chat enables fast prototyping with natural language across a wider range of editors.
Backend/data layer
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI understands frameworks like Spring, Django, and Rails with deep static analysis context.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot handles backend frameworks broadly but without the same depth of IDE-native understanding.
Deployment readiness
TieJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI's framework-aware suggestions are generally production-ready for supported stacks.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot suggestions are production-ready for common frameworks but vary in quality for niche stacks.
Long-term maintainability
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI respects project-level code style settings, enforcing consistency at the IDE level.
GitHub Copilot
Copilot follows community conventions but may not respect your team's specific style guidelines.
Code quality
JetBrains AI produces superior code quality within the JetBrains ecosystem, leveraging static analysis that Copilot cannot replicate. For non-JetBrains editors, Copilot is the clear choice.
Security
Both tools offer meaningful security features, with JetBrains AI having the advantage of integrating with IDE inspections for deeper analysis. Copilot's vulnerability filter is effective but IDE-independent.
Which should you choose?
Choose JetBrains AI if...
Use JetBrains AI if your team already uses IntelliJ-family IDEs and wants deeply integrated AI assistance.
JetBrains AI servicesChoose GitHub Copilot if...
Use GitHub Copilot if your team uses multiple editors or wants a consistent AI experience across the board.
GitHub Copilot servicesThe bottom line
JetBrains AI is the better choice for teams committed to the JetBrains ecosystem, particularly for complex backend development. GitHub Copilot is more versatile and the better choice for mixed-editor teams.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use both JetBrains AI and Copilot in the same IDE?
Yes, both plugins can be installed in JetBrains IDEs simultaneously, though running both may cause performance overhead.
Is JetBrains AI cheaper than Copilot?
JetBrains AI is included in the All Products Pack subscription and priced similarly to Copilot for individual plans.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.