JetBrains AI vs Cursor
JetBrains AI is embedded in the world's most powerful IDEs while Cursor is a VS Code-based AI-native editor. This comparison breaks down the code quality differences between these two approaches.
JetBrains AI integrates AI capabilities into mature IDEs with decades of static analysis investment, making it uniquely powerful for complex enterprise codebases. Cursor brings AI-first thinking to a VS Code foundation with fast iteration cycles and a growing feature set. Choosing between them often comes down to your existing IDE investment.
Head-to-head comparison
Code structure
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI leverages deep AST analysis to produce structurally precise suggestions for complex frameworks.
Cursor
Cursor's codebase indexing produces consistent structural suggestions but without AST-level precision.
Security
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI integrates with IDE inspections and SonarLint for comprehensive security analysis.
Cursor
Cursor surfaces basic security hints but relies on developers to catch deeper vulnerabilities.
Speed of prototyping
CursorJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI is powerful but operates within the heavier JetBrains IDE environment.
Cursor
Cursor's lighter VS Code base and AI-first design make it faster for rapid prototyping.
Backend/data layer
JetBrains AIJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI understands Spring, Hibernate, and complex ORM relationships through static analysis.
Cursor
Cursor handles backend tasks well through codebase indexing, though with less framework-specific depth.
Deployment readiness
TieJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI's framework-specific knowledge produces deployment-ready code for enterprise stacks.
Cursor
Cursor's context-aware suggestions are production-ready for most modern web development stacks.
Long-term maintainability
TieJetBrains AI
JetBrains AI enforces project code style and refactoring standards, supporting long-term quality.
Cursor
Cursor maintains codebase conventions through indexing, which scales well for growing projects.
Code quality
JetBrains AI produces superior code quality for complex enterprise applications through its static analysis integration. Cursor is more accessible and faster for iterative, modern web development.
Security
JetBrains AI has a clear security advantage through its IDE inspection engine and SonarLint integration. Cursor requires supplementary tooling to match this level of security analysis.
Which should you choose?
Choose JetBrains AI if...
Use JetBrains AI for complex enterprise applications in Java, Kotlin, or Python where static analysis depth matters.
JetBrains AI servicesChoose Cursor if...
Use Cursor for fast-moving web development projects where AI-first iteration speed is the priority.
Cursor servicesThe bottom line
JetBrains AI wins on depth and security for enterprise-grade development. Cursor wins on speed and accessibility for modern web and startup development workflows.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Will JetBrains AI work outside of JetBrains IDEs?
No, JetBrains AI is exclusive to IntelliJ-family IDEs, whereas Cursor is a standalone VS Code-based editor.
Is Cursor suitable for Java development?
Cursor supports Java but lacks JetBrains' decades of Java-specific IDE intelligence, making JetBrains AI the better choice for Java teams.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.