DevinvsWindsurf

Devin vs Windsurf

Devin works autonomously while you do other things. Windsurf gives you control with AI assistance. Windsurf produces more predictable, maintainable code. Devin offers hands-free operation for well-defined tasks.

Get Your Code Reviewed — $19

Devin and Windsurf represent the two poles of AI-assisted development. Devin is fully autonomous — describe a task and it works independently. Windsurf keeps the developer in the loop — you guide the AI and review changes as they happen. The code quality trade-off is predictability versus autonomy.

Head-to-head comparison

Code structure

Windsurf

Devin

Variable. Autonomous decisions lead to unpredictable architecture. May choose unusual patterns or dependencies. Good projects have clean structure; complex projects can accumulate workarounds.

Windsurf

Well-organized multi-file projects with consistent separation of concerns. Predictable architecture that follows established patterns. Occasionally introduces subtle inter-file bugs.

Security

Windsurf

Devin

Makes autonomous security choices that need human review. May implement auth well or may miss critical access controls. Every security decision should be validated.

Windsurf

Auth middleware with occasional logical bypasses. SQL queries that sometimes use string concatenation. Security infrastructure exists but has subtle gaps.

Backend / data layer

Tie

Devin

Can build backends in any language with flexible architecture. Capable of complex integrations and business logic. Quality depends on task definition clarity.

Windsurf

Full-stack with proper database integration, API routes, and server-side logic. Standard patterns with mainstream ORMs and database providers.

Speed of prototyping

Tie

Devin

Works autonomously on tasks. Slower per-task but requires no developer attention during execution. Can work overnight on well-defined tasks.

Windsurf

Requires active developer participation. Faster per-feature when the developer is engaged. More interactive and iterative.

Deployment readiness

Windsurf

Devin

Deployment readiness depends on the task and Devin's autonomous choices. May or may not include proper deployment configuration.

Windsurf

Standard projects that deploy to any platform. Proper build configuration and environment variable handling out of the box.

Long-term maintainability

Windsurf

Devin

Unpredictable. Some projects are well-organized, others have debugging workaround layers that make maintenance difficult.

Windsurf

Consistent, modular architecture that supports team development and long-term iteration. A developer can pick it up and extend it.

Code quality

Windsurf produces more predictable, maintainable code because a developer guides the process. Devin's output varies — excellent for well-defined tasks but quality degrades with complexity. For production codebases, Windsurf's human-in-the-loop approach yields more reliable results.

Security

Windsurf has more consistent security infrastructure, even if it has gaps. Devin's security posture is unpredictable — it may or may not implement proper auth and access controls. Windsurf security issues can be systematically checked for; Devin security decisions need case-by-case review.

Which should you choose?

Choose Devin if...

Well-defined, isolated tasks where autonomy is an advantage. Best for prototyping, proof-of-concepts, and delegated work when you can review the output.

Devin services

Choose Windsurf if...

Developers building production applications who want AI acceleration without giving up control. Best for maintainable codebases with consistent quality.

Windsurf services

The bottom line

Windsurf for production code where quality and predictability matter. Devin for autonomous execution of well-defined tasks where you can review the output. If you are building something you will maintain, Windsurf is the safer choice. Devin is valuable when you need AI to work independently.

Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code

Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.

Security Scan

Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.

$19
  • OWASP Top 10 checks
  • SSL/TLS analysis
  • Security headers
  • Expert review within 24h
Get Started

Code Audit

In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.

$19
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Code quality review
  • Dependency audit
  • AI pattern analysis
Get Started
Best Value

Complete Bundle

Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.

$29$38
  • Everything in both products
  • Cross-referenced findings
  • Unified action plan
Get Started

100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use Devin and Windsurf together?

Yes. Task Devin with well-defined subtasks and review the output in Windsurf. This combines Devin's autonomy with Windsurf's developer control for review and refinement. Use Devin for initial implementation and Windsurf for polish.

Which is better for a solo developer?

Windsurf. You maintain control and build more predictable code. Devin's value is autonomy, which matters more for teams delegating tasks. A solo developer gets more from interactive AI assistance than from autonomous agents.

Other comparisons

Cursor vs Lovable

Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.

Cursor vs Bolt.new

Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.

Cursor vs v0

Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

Cursor is more capable for building full features.

Not sure which tool to use?

We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.

Tell Us About Your App