Augment Code vs Cursor
Augment Code is an enterprise-focused AI coding platform while Cursor is the leading AI-native IDE. This comparison evaluates how they differ on code quality for professional development.
Augment Code is designed for large engineering teams, with deep codebase understanding and long-context memory built for enterprise-scale repositories. Cursor serves developers across team sizes with a polished AI IDE that balances power and accessibility. Both aim to be your primary AI coding environment but approach the market differently.
Head-to-head comparison
Code structure
Augment CodeAugment Code
Augment Code's long-context memory maintains architectural awareness across very large codebases.
Cursor
Cursor produces structurally consistent code through codebase indexing, scaling well for mid-size projects.
Security
Augment CodeAugment Code
Augment Code offers enterprise security controls and keeps code within defined data boundaries.
Cursor
Cursor provides cloud-based processing with enterprise options for stricter data handling.
Speed of prototyping
TieAugment Code
Augment Code's deep context enables accurate prototyping in complex codebases without losing project context.
Cursor
Cursor's intuitive chat and autocomplete make it fast for prototyping in projects of any size.
Backend/data layer
Augment CodeAugment Code
Augment Code understands complex backend architectures across microservices with persistent memory.
Cursor
Cursor handles backend tasks well with indexing but may lose context in very large distributed systems.
Deployment readiness
TieAugment Code
Augment Code's enterprise focus produces code that adheres to organizational standards and deployment patterns.
Cursor
Cursor generates deployment-ready code for common stacks with standard review cycles.
Long-term maintainability
Augment CodeAugment Code
Augment Code's persistent codebase memory ensures consistent pattern application over long project lifetimes.
Cursor
Cursor's indexing promotes consistency but may drift on very long-lived, large codebases.
Code quality
Augment Code leads for large enterprise codebases where persistent memory and deep architectural context matter. Cursor delivers comparable quality for most development scenarios at a lower complexity cost.
Security
Augment Code's enterprise security posture gives it an edge for compliance-sensitive organizations. Cursor's enterprise tier addresses many security concerns but is not purpose-built for regulated industries.
Which should you choose?
Choose Augment Code if...
Use Augment Code for large enterprise engineering teams working across complex, multi-service codebases.
Augment Code servicesChoose Cursor if...
Use Cursor for teams of any size that want a polished AI IDE with strong autocomplete and chat features.
Cursor servicesThe bottom line
Augment Code is the stronger choice for large engineering organizations with complex codebases and strict security requirements. Cursor is the more practical choice for most product teams and startups.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Is Augment Code available for individuals?
Augment Code is primarily enterprise-focused, with pricing and features designed for engineering teams rather than individual developers.
How does Augment Code's memory differ from Cursor's indexing?
Augment Code maintains persistent, long-context memory across sessions, while Cursor re-indexes at session start, making Augment better for very large codebases.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.