Amazon Q vs Cursor
Amazon Q is AWS's cloud-native coding assistant while Cursor is the leading AI-native IDE. This comparison reveals how they differ on code quality for modern software development.
Amazon Q Developer is purpose-built for AWS workflows, offering deep integration with cloud services, security scanning, and infrastructure-as-code support. Cursor is a general-purpose AI IDE that excels across any stack. Developers choosing between them are often weighing cloud specialization against general-purpose capability.
Head-to-head comparison
Code structure
TieAmazon Q
Amazon Q generates well-structured AWS service integrations and infrastructure code with precision.
Cursor
Cursor produces structurally consistent code across any framework by indexing your full codebase.
Security
Amazon QAmazon Q
Amazon Q's CodeGuru-powered security scanning identifies and remediates real vulnerabilities.
Cursor
Cursor lacks deep security scanning and relies on the developer to catch security issues.
Speed of prototyping
CursorAmazon Q
Amazon Q accelerates AWS-specific prototyping but is slower for non-AWS features.
Cursor
Cursor's chat and multi-file editing make it fast for prototyping across any technology stack.
Backend/data layer
TieAmazon Q
Amazon Q handles AWS data services and serverless backends with unmatched depth.
Cursor
Cursor handles backend tasks across any framework with strong cross-file data layer understanding.
Deployment readiness
Amazon QAmazon Q
Amazon Q's output for AWS services is deployment-ready with accurate IAM and configuration knowledge.
Cursor
Cursor produces complete feature implementations but lacks cloud-specific deployment awareness.
Long-term maintainability
TieAmazon Q
Amazon Q enforces AWS best practices, keeping cloud infrastructure maintainable over time.
Cursor
Cursor promotes codebase-wide consistency through indexing, supporting long-term quality.
Code quality
Amazon Q leads for cloud-native and AWS-specific code quality, especially on security and deployment. Cursor is the stronger choice for full-stack development across diverse technology stacks.
Security
Amazon Q's integrated security scanning is a major differentiator. Cursor-assisted development requires separate security tooling to match Amazon Q's built-in vulnerability detection.
Which should you choose?
Choose Amazon Q if...
Use Amazon Q when your application is primarily AWS-based and security scanning is a priority.
Amazon Q servicesChoose Cursor if...
Use Cursor when you need a versatile AI IDE that excels across the full stack regardless of cloud provider.
Cursor servicesThe bottom line
Amazon Q is the better tool for AWS-native teams who need deep cloud expertise and security features. Cursor is the better general-purpose AI IDE for teams with diverse or non-AWS technology stacks.
Whichever tool you used, we'll review the code
Get a professional review of your AI-generated code at a fixed price.
Security Scan
Black-box review of your public-facing app. No code access needed.
- OWASP Top 10 checks
- SSL/TLS analysis
- Security headers
- Expert review within 24h
Code Audit
In-depth review of your source code for security, quality, and best practices.
- Security vulnerabilities
- Code quality review
- Dependency audit
- AI pattern analysis
Complete Bundle
Both scans in one package with cross-referenced findings.
- Everything in both products
- Cross-referenced findings
- Unified action plan
100% credited toward any paid service. Start with an audit, then let us fix what we find.
Frequently asked questions
Can I use Amazon Q and Cursor together?
Yes, you could use Amazon Q for AWS-specific tasks and Cursor for general development, though switching between tools adds friction.
Is Amazon Q free?
Amazon Q Developer has a free tier for individuals with limited usage, while Cursor requires a paid subscription.
Other comparisons
Cursor vs Lovable
Cursor produces more production-ready code but requires coding knowledge.
Cursor vs Bolt.new
Cursor gets closer to production-ready code.
Cursor vs v0
Cursor builds full-stack apps while v0 generates UI components.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
Cursor is more capable for building full features.
Not sure which tool to use?
We've reviewed code from every major AI coding tool. Book a free call and we'll help you understand what your code needs.